Compensation in personal injury cases is generally divided into economic damages like medical bills and non-economic damages like pain and suffering. This page explains the differences between these categories and how they are calculated during a lawsuit. Understanding both types of damages helps plaintiffs realize the full potential value of their legal claim.
The information provided in this article is for general informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Statutes of limitations and legal rights can vary based on specific facts and circumstances. You should not rely on this information without consulting a qualified attorney about your particular situation.
When you’re injured in an accident, the pain is often immediate. The clarity about money is not.
Most people can tell you how much it costs to repair their car or pay an emergency room bill. What’s far harder to understand is how the law values things like chronic pain, anxiety, or the fact that you can no longer lift your child or enjoy the activities that once defined your life.
Under California personal injury law, compensation is broken into two categories: economic damages and non-economic damages. Knowing the difference—and how each is proven—matters. It can be the difference between a settlement that merely covers bills and one that actually reflects what you’ve lost.
The Two Types of Compensatory Damages in California
Compensatory damages are meant to make an injured person “whole.” While no amount of money can undo an injury, this is the system we have to hold wrongdoers accountable and to help injured people rebuild their lives.
These are the out-of-pocket, measurable financial losses caused by the injury. They are typically supported by documents such as bills, invoices, and wage records. Because they are objective, they are usually the easiest category to prove.
These damages address the human cost of an injury. Pain. Emotional trauma. Permanent limitations. Changes to your lifestyle and relationships.
They are real, but they are not easily reduced to a spreadsheet. And because the civil justice system has no other mechanism to compensate these losses, money is the only tool available.
Economic Damages: The Tangible Financial Losses
Economic damages form the foundation of most personal injury claims. With good documentation, they are often the least disputed portion of a case.
Medical Bills and Future Medical Care
This includes emergency treatment, hospital stays, surgery, physical therapy, medications, and follow-up care. Just as important, it also includes future medical expenses.
If an accident accelerates arthritis, damages a joint, or causes a condition that will require surgery years down the road, those costs must be evaluated and claimed now—not later.
Lost Wages and Loss of Earning Capacity
If you missed work because of your injuries, you are entitled to recover those lost wages.
If your injuries prevent you from returning to the same job, force you into a lower-paying position, or shorten your working life, you may also recover loss of earning capacity. These damages are often supported by vocational experts and forensic economists who project what you would have earned but for the injury.
Property Damage
This includes repair or replacement of your vehicle, rental car expenses, and personal property damaged in the incident—such as phones, laptops, glasses, or child safety seats.
Non-Economic Damages: Valuing Pain, Loss, and Trauma
This is where most serious disputes arise. Insurance companies are comfortable paying bills. They are far less comfortable paying for pain they cannot measure with a calculator.
Pain and Suffering
“Pain and suffering” refers to the physical pain and emotional distress caused by an injury.
There is no fixed formula. The value depends on how the injury affects you. The same injury can have very different consequences depending on a person’s profession, lifestyle, and daily responsibilities. A hand injury does not carry the same impact for a concert pianist as it does for someone whose job does not rely on fine motor skills.
Emotional Distress and Anxiety
Mental and emotional injuries are compensable under California law.
Anxiety, PTSD, sleep disturbances, fear of driving, and ongoing emotional distress following an accident are all recognized damages when they are tied to the injury and supported by evidence.
Loss of Consortium
Loss of consortium is typically claimed by the injured person’s spouse and addresses the loss of companionship, affection, support, and intimacy caused by serious injuries.
Are There Limits? California Damage Caps You Should Know About
In most personal injury cases, California does not cap pain and suffering damages. However, there are important exceptions.
Proposition 213 (Uninsured Drivers)
Under California’s “No Pay, No Play” law, if you were driving without insurance at the time of the accident, you generally cannot recover non-economic damages—even if the other driver was entirely at fault.
You may still recover economic damages like medical bills and property damage, but not pain and suffering.
However, there are exceptions. As such, it is important to consult with an attorney regarding your case.
Multiple Defendants and the “Deep Pockets” Rule (Civil Code § 1431.2)
When more than one party is at fault, California law treats damages differently depending on the category.
This distinction can significantly affect recovery in cases involving multiple defendants.
FAQ: Proving and Valuing Non-Economic Damages
How is “loss of enjoyment of life” proven?
Attorneys typically show the contrast between life before and after the injury. This can include:
These forms of evidence help juries understand the real-world impact of an injury.
Is there a cap on pain and suffering in California?
Generally, no—unless the case involves medical malpractice (MICRA) or an uninsured driver (Proposition 213). In most car, truck, premises, and workplace injury cases, a jury may award whatever amount it finds reasonable based on the evidence.
Reminder:
This content is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as legal advice. Every case is different. If you have questions about your rights or deadlines, consult a qualified attorney promptly.
At Tan Ngo Law, our core values are the cornerstone of our practice. We recognize the immense trust our clients place in us, often during the most difficult times in their lives, and we are honored to offer our assistance.
Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. While we strive to ensure that the information is accurate and up-to-date, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
No Attorney-Client Relationship: Use of this website or contacting us through this site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Tan Ngo Law. An attorney-client relationship is established only through a written agreement signed by both you and our firm.
Confidentiality: Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established. Any information sent to us before establishing an attorney-client relationship may not be treated as confidential and may not be protected by attorney-client privilege.
Third-Party Links: This website may contain links to third-party websites. These links are provided for your convenience only. We do not endorse the content of third-party sites and are not responsible for the content or accuracy of any information on these websites. Accessing any third-party website links from our site is done at your own risk.
No Guarantee of Results: Every legal matter is unique, and the outcomes of past cases handled by Tan Ngo Law do not guarantee similar results in future cases. Testimonials or endorsements on this website do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.
